The walls of privilege in the shadow of two deaths | WGLNG.com

The walls of privilege in the shadow of two deaths

Two young athletes died under the care of a powerful institution, while their families were left fighting for the answers that privilege can so easily delay.
Two young athletes died under the care of a powerful institution, while their families were left fighting for the answers that privilege can so easily delay.

Two young men died. One was a recruit from Mindanao, from a poor family, pursuing a dream that might have been his way to a better life. The other was a Nigerian student-athlete, far from home, trusting an elite institution with his future.

Both were valuable while they could play basketball, carry the school’s name and add to its prestige. After their deaths, however, their families were left demanding answers from people protected by lawyers, administrators and carefully prepared statements.

What did we initially see from Ateneo? Silence. Then controlled statements. Eventually, apologies, investigations and resignations; a response that arrived only after public anger, faculty criticism and government scrutiny.

The university president said the institution chose silence out of respect for the grieving families. But respect for whom? The families themselves were asking for answers. Silence may protect an investigation, but it can also protect an institution from having to confront uncomfortable questions in public.

This is what elitism looks like from below.

It is not merely expensive tuition, polished English or exclusive addresses. It is the confidence that powerful institutions may decide when ordinary people deserve explanations. It is the instinct to protect reputation before establishing accountability. It is the ability to invoke privacy, procedure and due process while grieving families plead publicly just to learn how their children died.

We ordinary Filipinos know this arrangement well. We are the workers who build their campuses, the crowds who fill their arenas and the public whose attention fuels their glory. But when something goes terribly wrong, we are reminded where we stand.

For the families, these deaths are permanent. For a powerful institution, they risk becoming a crisis to be managed: issue a statement, form a panel, accept a resignation, wait for the outrage to subside and eventually return to business.

Perhaps the investigations will establish responsibility. Perhaps policies will change. But I am skeptical that this tragedy will make any real dent in Philippine elitism. The system is larger than one coach, administrator or university. It survives because wealth and prestige soften consequences that would fall immediately and brutally upon ordinary people.

The rich will continue building their walls. The poor will continue living—and sometimes dying—in their shadows. The Ateneos of this country will apologize, reorganize and move forward.

Meanwhile, two families will never move forward in quite the same way.

Two young men entrusted their futures to a powerful institution. Their families must now fight for the truth about how those futures ended. That alone tells us who holds the power; and who is expected to bear its consequences.


Categories Institutional Rot, Oligarchic Theater